Published by Anti-Money Laundering Council(AMLCS) on June 8, 2022.
Requested from AMLC by J. None at 11:56 PM on
June 8, 2022.
Purpose: The scammer should have his bank account frozen.
BDO Account: 007166001116
Roberto Cruz
Date of Coverage: 06/07/2022 - 06/08/2022
Tracking no: #AMLCS-340243117918
P.JAVIER
June 8, 2022, 11:56 p.m.
Hi! I hope you get this request. On June 7,2022, I got scammed in Facebook Marketplace when I was buying a computer monitor. Since it was my first time buying a monitor, I did not know the standards of how this kind of transaction goes. I messaged the scammer inquiring about the monitor and gave him half of the payment for Php 3,000.00. When it was time to deliver the product, he said that no rider is accepting it so I asked him his address saying I'll be the one to book it but after saying that, he left the conversation and that's when I knew I got scammed.
F.OFFICER
June 29, 2022, 8:02 a.m.
June 29, 2022
Dear Psalms,
Thank you for your request dated Jun 08, 2022 under Executive Order No. 2 (s. 2016) on Freedom of Information in the Executive Branch, for Request for bank account to be frozen.
We received your request on Jun 08, 2022 and will respond on or before Jun 29, 2022 11:56:22 PM, in accordance with the Executive Order's implementing rules and regulations.
Should you have any questions regarding your request, kindly contact me using the reply function on the eFOI portal at https://www.foi.gov.ph/requests/aglzfmVmb2ktcGhyHwsSB0NvbnRlbnQiEkFNTENTLTM0MDI0MzExNzkxOAw, for request with ticket number #AMLCS-340243117918.
Thank you.
Respectfully,
FOI Receiving Officer
A.DECISION MAKER
June 29, 2022, 8:57 a.m.
June 29, 2022
Dear Ms. Javier,
Greetings!
Thank you for your request dated Jun 08, 2022 11:56:22 PM under Executive Order No. 2 (s. 2016) on Freedom of Information in the Executive Branch.
We note that the information you provided pertains to a possible violation of Republic Act No. 3815, otherwise known as the Revised Penal Code. And the request is for the freezing of the specified bank account.
Section 7(6) of Republic Act (RA) No. 9160, otherwise known as the Anti-Money Laundering Act of 2001, as amended (AMLA), and Section 11 of RA No. 10168, also known as the Terrorism Financing Prevention and Suppression Act of 2012 (TFPSA), authorizes the AMLC 1) to apply before the Court of Appeals, ex parte, for the freezing of any monetary instrument or property alleged to be laundered, proceeds from, or instrumentalities used in or intended for use in any unlawful activity as defined in Section 3(i); and (2) to issue an ex parte order to freeze without delay property or funds that are in any way related to financing of terrorism or acts of terrorism or to property or funds of any person, group of persons, terrorist organization, or association, in relation to whom there is probable cause to believe that they are committing or attempting or conspiring to commit, or participating in or facilitating the commission of financing of terrorism or acts of terrorism.
A common requirement for both is the existence of probable cause. Probable cause refers to "such facts and circumstances which would lead a reasonably discreet and prudent man to believe that: (1) any monetary instrument or property sought to be frozen ... is in any way related to any unlawful activity and/or money laundering offense; ..."
In the present case, the AMLC does not have the authority to issue a freeze order as the offense does not relate to terrorism financing. Neither can the AMLC file a petition for issuance of the freeze order, for although a predicate crime (estafa) has been alleged, probable cause has not yet been established. Existing jurisprudence states that mere allegation is not evidence, and is not equivalent to proof.
Foregoing considered, the AMLC cannot grant your request for freezing the subject bank account. However, it is recommended that you file a complaint before the Philippine National Police (PNP), and/or the National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) as the matter concerns a possible commission of estafa/swindling, committed through cybercrime, which is under their jurisdiction.
We hope we have been of assistance.
Respectfully,
FOI Decision Maker
Is this request offensive?
Requests for personal information and vexatious requests are not considered valid requests for Official Information.
If you believe this request is not suitable, you can report it for attention by the site administrators.