Published by Department of Transportation(DOTr) on March 19, 2019.
Requested from DOTr by K. Marcelo at 12:09 PM on
March 19, 2019.
Purpose: Research and Development of Thesis
Date of Coverage: 03/19/2019 - 03/19/2019
Tracking no: #DOTr-360524901306
K.MARCELO
March 19, 2019, 12:09 p.m.
Good Day! I am Kelvin Ryan S. Marcelo an Engineering Research and Development for Technology (ERDT) scholar of the DOST at UP Diliman. For my study about mode choice modeling, I would to request for information regarding:
1) Final Locations of all the stations of MRT 7
2) Average speed of the train used
3) Average arrival rates at the stations
4) Train Model (visual interior)
5) Projected (Estimated) Fare Matrix
6) Feasibility Study on MRT 7
D.DOTR
March 20, 2019, 5:51 p.m.
I already forwarded your request to MRT7 Project Management Office. Thank you.
D.DOTR
March 28, 2019, 8:39 a.m.
March 28, 2019
Dear Kelvin Ryan Marcelo,
Greetings!
Thank you for your request dated Mar 19, 2019 12:09:12 PM under Executive Order No. 2 (s. 2016) on Freedom of Information in the Executive Branch.
You asked for MRT Line 7 Data.
Your FOI request is approved. I enclosed some of the requested documents to the email address that you had provided.
The maximum operational speed of the train is 80 km/hr. Its design speed is 90 km/hr
For the Feasibility Study, please take note that we cannot provide you the said document as it is within the proprietary rights of the concessionaire, the San Miguel Corporation. MRT-7 is a Public-Private Partnership project, thus, the project cost is all shouldered by SMC including the conduct of the FS. Kindly make a formal request letter to SMC for a copy of the FS.
"It should be noted that the Freedom of Information principle under Executive Order No. 2 dated 23 July 2016 (An Order Operationalizing the Executive Branch the People’s Constitutional Right to Information and the State Policies to Full Public Disclosure and Transparency in the Public Service and Providing Guidelines Therefor) is not absolute since there are information and documents that the Government may still withhold from the public or any requesting person.
Accordingly, in the case of Chavez vs. Presidential Commission on Good Government, the Supreme Court clearly emphasized that aside from national security matters, intelligence information, bank transactions (pursuant to Secrecy of Bank Deposit Act), trade or industrial secrets (pursuant to Intellectual Property Code and other related laws) are also exempt from compulsory disclosure. Trade Secrets may not be the subject of compulsory disclosure. By reason of their confidential and privileged character, if disclosed, would eventually exposed to unwarranted business competition with others who may imitate and market the same kind of products or industry in violation of proprietary rights.
Relatively, in accordance with Memorandum dated 24 November 2016 (Inventory of Exceptions to Executive No. 2, Series of 2016 or the Freedom of Information Order) of Executive Secretary Salvador C. Medialdea, trade secrets, intellectual property, business, commercial, financial and other proprietary information are one of the exceptions to the public’s Right of Access to Information.
This Office opines that the same contains trade and industrial secrets as well as non-disclosure provisions affecting the Intellectual Property Rights of certain individuals, consulting firms and institutions that conducted the plans, designs and surveys for the said projects. As such, those persons or entities possessed certain proprietary and economic rights on the “Feasibility Studies and other related documents” considering that its plans, designs and surveys thereof are not known to the general public and are peculiar to them.
For this reason, the DOTr, being the recipient of the these documents has the right to safeguard its trade or industrial secrets against competitors of said individuals, consulting firms and institutions as well as the public. Otherwise, such information, if disclosed or disseminated can be illegally and unfairly utilized by other business competitors who, through their access to those business secrets, may use the same for their own private gain and to the irreparable prejudice of the owner of the said “documents.”
If you are not satisfied with the result of the review, you then have the right to appeal to the Office of the President under Administrative Order No. 22 (s. 2011).
Thank you.
Respectfully,
DOTR-DM DOTR
FOI Receiving Officer
Is this request offensive?
Requests for personal information and vexatious requests are not considered valid requests for Official Information.
If you believe this request is not suitable, you can report it for attention by the site administrators.