Published by National Telecommunications Commission(NTC) on May 19, 2020.
Requested from NTC by D. Mejes at 06:17 PM on
May 19, 2020.
Purpose: For academic research purposes
Date of Coverage: 01/01/1995 - 05/19/2020
Tracking no: #NTC-947804005921
D.MEJES
May 19, 2020, 6:17 p.m.
Hi! I would like to request for the names and license numbers of VAS the NTC has sanctioned for violating Section 11 of RA 7925 or provision 420(b) of Memorandum Circular 8-9-95.
D.DAQUIOAG
June 5, 2020, 4:14 p.m.
June 5, 2020
Dear Dan,
Thank you for your request dated May 19, 2020 under Executive Order No. 2 (s. 2016) on Freedom of Information in the Executive Branch, for List of VAS Providers relevant to Memorandum Circular 8-9-95.
Please be informed that there was a suspension in processing all FOI request from the general public due to the pandemic situation which caused the delay of accepting your request.
However, we accepted your request on June 56 2020 and will respond on or before June 26, 2020 04:13 PM, in accordance with the Executive Order's, implementing rules and regulations.
Should you have any questions regarding your request, kindly contact me using the reply function on the eFOI portal at https://www.foi.gov.ph/requests/aglzfmVmb2ktcGhyHQsSB0NvbnRlbnQiEE5UQy05NDc4MDQwMDU5MjEM, for request with ticket number #NTC-947804005921.
Thank you.
Respectfully,
Divina Daquioag
FOI Officer
A.CABARIOS
Aug. 5, 2020, 2:12 p.m.
August 5, 2020
Dear Dan Mejes,
I refer to my letter of May 19, 2020 06:17:54 PM about your request under Executive Order No. 2 (s. 2016) on Freedom of Information in the Executive Branch, for List of VAS Providers relevant to Memorandum Circular 8-9-95.
Due to the present pandemic situation and the work-arrangement of the employees concerned, we encountered a sort of problem in responding to your request. However, may we request you to please file a new request in our portal and ensure to observe FOI exemptions listed in the FOI People's Manual.
Rest assured that we will try our very best to provide your request as long as it is available and acceptable for disclosure to the public.
You may use the reply function on the eFOI portal at https://pcoomaster11222017150000-dot-efoi-ph.appspot.com/requests/aglzfmVmb2ktcGhyHQsSB0NvbnRlbnQiEE5UQy05NDc4MDQwMDU5MjEM, for request with ticket number #NTC-947804005921, to respond.
During the period of us awaiting your reply, your request will be put on hold. If we do not receive a reply on or before Oct 28, 2020 05:59:22 AM, your request will be closed.
We hope to hear from you at the soonest possible time.
Thank you.
Respectfully,
Deputy Commissioner Edgardo Cabarios
Decision Maker
A.CABARIOS
Oct. 28, 2020, 2:33 p.m.
Oct 28, 2020
Dear Dan,
I refer to my letter of Aug 05, 2020 about your request under Executive Order No. 2 (s. 2016) on Freedom of Information in the Executive Branch, for List of VAS Providers relevant to Memorandum Circular 8-9-95. In particular, I had requested specific information for you to clarify upon in order for us to proceed with the request.
As we have not received a reply within the 60-day working period since the letter requesting for clarification was sent out, we regret to inform you that this request will be closed as of Oct 28, 2020.
You may wish to submit a new request describing the specific information you are looking for, and we will be able to consider it under the guidelines as stated in Executive Order No. 2.
Your right to request a review
If you are unhappy with this response to your FOI request, you may ask us to carry out an internal review of the response by writing to or visiting our central office. Your review request should explain why you are dissatisfied with this response, and should be made within 15 calendar days from the date when you received this letter. We will complete the review and tell you the result within 30 calendar days from the date when we receive your review request.
If you are not satisfied with the result of the review, you then have the right to appeal to the Office of the President under Administrative Order No. 22 (s. 2011).
Thank you.
Respectfully,
Deputy Commissioner Edgardo
FOI Officer
Is this request offensive?
Requests for personal information and vexatious requests are not considered valid requests for Official Information.
If you believe this request is not suitable, you can report it for attention by the site administrators.