You have submitted an FOI request
Date: Sept. 12, 2018, 11:27 p.m.
Your request is already in review
Your request was denied
Date: 2018-09-18 11:01:17.000000
How was your request?
Published by Department of Transportation(DOTr) on Sept. 12, 2018.
Requested from DOTr by Y. Ganzon at 11:27 PM on
Sept. 12, 2018.
Purpose: Thesis Study
Date of Coverage: 09/12/2018 - 09/12/2018
Tracking no: #DOTr-036084157916
Hi! I would like to request for information regarding: 1. Feasibility study of Airport in Quezon Province. 2. Feasibility study of Mauban Quezon International Airport proposal. 3. Feasibility study of Lucena City Airport proposal. attached files is the letter of request and valid school I.D Thank You very much.
Good day Sir. Per our records, you already lodged the same request last 6 September 2018, with tracking no. #DOTr-399865044341. Below is our response to the abovementioned request: "Your FOI request is approved. However, per Civil Aviation Authority of the Philippines (CAAP), there are no ongoing airport projects in Quezon province. Also, per our legal department, feasibility studies cannot be disclosed due to certain limitations and restrictions as provided by law." For you to understand why we are denying your request, below is the excerpt from the memorandum released by our legal department regarding release and sharing of documents: "After review of our legal department, this Office is of the view that the request cannot be given due course considering that the disclosure of the said “Feasibility Studies” are subject to certain limitations and restrictions as provided by law. It should be noted that the Freedom of Information principle under Executive Order No. 2 dated 23 July 2016 (An Order Operationalizing the Executive Branch the People’s Constitutional Right to Information and the State Policies to Full Public Disclosure and Transparency in the Public Service and Providing Guidelines Therefor) is not absolute since there are information and documents that the Government may still withhold from the public or any requesting person. Accordingly, in the case of Chavez vs. Presidential Commission on Good Government, the Supreme Court clearly emphasized that aside from national security matters, intelligence information, bank transactions (pursuant to Secrecy of Bank Deposit Act), trade or industrial secrets (pursuant to Intellectual Property Code and other related laws) are also exempt from compulsory disclosure. Trade Secrets may not be the subject of compulsory disclosure. By reason of their confidential and privileged character, if disclosed, would eventually exposed to unwarranted business competition with others who may imitate and market the same kind of products or industry in violation of proprietary rights. Relatively, in accordance with Memorandum dated 24 November 2016 (Inventory of Exceptions to Executive No. 2, Series of 2016 or the Freedom of Information Order) of Executive Secretary Salvador C. Medialdea, trade secrets, intellectual property, business, commercial, financial and other proprietary information are one of the exceptions to the public’s Right of Access to Information. Thus, as regards the requested “Feasibility Studies”, this Office opines that the same contains trade and industrial secrets as well as non-disclosure provisions affecting the Intellectual Property Rights of certain individuals, consulting firms and institutions that conducted the plans, designs and surveys for the said projects. As such, those persons or entities possessed certain proprietary and economic rights on the “Feasibility Studies” considering that its plans, designs and surveys thereof are not known to the general public and are peculiar to them. For this reason, the DOTr, being the recipient of the “Feasibility,” has the right to safeguard its trade or industrial secrets against competitors of said individuals, consulting firms and institutions as well as the public. Otherwise, such information, if disclosed or disseminated can be illegally and unfairly utilized by other business competitors who, through their access to those business secrets, may use the same for their own private gain and to the irreparable prejudice of the owner of the said “Feasibility Studies.” Thank you. DOTr-DM